Gutenberg and WordPress page builder: main differences between them

Over the past year, after the launch of WordPress 5.0, there has been an endless debate between Gutenberg’s future prospects and this method against the conventional existing page builder of WordPress. Today, a year and a half later, the debate continues. As more people upgrade to WordPress 5.0, someone asks if Gutenberg will bring revolutionary changes to the world of page building. Is it an ideal alternative to existing drag and drop builders, such as elementor, divi, and Beaver builder? Launched in June 2017, Matt Mullenweg introduced Gutenberg as the ultimate basic block editor for WordPress. Since then, the use experience has reached a perfect balance between good and bad around the world, and different responses have been obtained.
Gutenberg had many problems at the beginning, such as no response or limited function, slow function and so on. However, considering the latest version of word press 5.4 – Gutenberg, it now looks like a powerful tool with a fast reactive block editing mechanism. But the real question now is, do you still have a chance for free versions of other advanced page builder plug-ins? Or the main difference between the two plug-ins? Well, such comparison and query is always inevitable now. Therefore, in this article, we try to explain several basic differences between Gutenberg and WordPress page billder. Therefore, if you are confused about the suitability between the two page builders, you can make the right choice. Something more suitable for you.
Gutenberg University WordPress page builder: the main difference may be that some of you now use Gutenberg and WordPress page builder on the website without knowing the actual difference. Therefore, you may not know the actual purpose of using these wizard tools, which help to better organize the website. Therefore, people in this category will clearly find that the following differences are interesting. Here, we compare the basic advantages, disadvantages and suggestions of each tool. Here we go. Comparison of main products of Gutenberg and WordPress page builder androg analyze tools according to the following standards:
Blocks and parts simple content editing blocks are the main configured blocks of Gutenberg, which is also the reason why most people complain about the lack of deformation of the functions of blocks and functions. Many of Gutenberg’s basic blocks may be sufficient to form everyday content elements, but this may not be enough for more important or more detailed designs. However, the latest updates now make columnar blocks more flexible, but do not mask the shortcomings of block design options. On the contrary, WordPress page builder has various blocks, parts, additional functions, etc. This allows you to bring the desired page closer to your imagination. Users can also use other advanced elements, such as slider, carousel, side-by-side comparison, table, induced click copywriting button, etc.
Gutenberg mainly works as a back-end block based editor for editing the content of the editing options page. You tried to activate the front-end editing option, but you still can’t provide the user with the exact way the page is displayed on the front-end. When hiding menus and other setting options in the back-end editor panel, the front desk provides a fair idea of viewing. But this is still not the actual picture of the page or post being edited. Preview can accurately understand the appearance of the page or content after publishing.
Male element and other word press page builders provide drag and drop page creation function and real-time editing function. This is to edit parts and others
This means that you can view all changes on the page in real time and move possible functions at the same time. All adjustments appear to be real-time changes in front of you, without leaving or saving the page. In this way, the modifications required for location or content customization can be made correctly, so editing is very easy. When using the theme, extension and compatibility area tenberk, you cannot simply change or adjust the WordPress theme or add extension functions to improve usability. In the whole user experience, most of them remain unchanged and idle.
When using Gutenberg, the style of the theme remains the same, but the number of CSS and custom CSS that can be added to the block is limited. Because there are not many options that can be changed or played, it can sometimes be very boring for many users. However, if you use page builder, it will not. To improve the performance and usability of page building, you are free to use multiple popular additions or extensions in basic topics. In essence, most are fully compatible and will not conflict with the original performance. You can also explicitly change and update the styles and settings of a theme. Therefore, if you want to create a custom page layout, a series of functions are very useful to you.
The limited page format options for page format and content design are Gutenberg’s shortcomings from the beginning of publishing. You can add a percentage of the column width, but you are not allowed to add a custom width of the block. And the design options are not so innovative. Switching from an existing structure or color to another structure or color requires a lot of work. However, in terms of content composition and design, WordPress page builder is always one step ahead of Gutenberg. Specifying or designing page formats is surprisingly simple, fast, and easy.
Through the user-friendly interface, users can adjust all types of pages more easily than ever before, such as zoom, color, font, custom position, element conversion, down jacket, etc. It is also true that if the page being designed is heavy, there may be a slight delay. Reactivity and performance recently, with the development of modern technology, most plug-ins adopt reactive design. Test on all platforms to ensure performance benchmarks. Therefore, in this case, Gutenberg is no different. We tested the performance and responsiveness on various devices, and adjusted the design settings on this basis.
Gutenberg is a lightweight tool, so there has not been any type of speed degradation or performance delay so far. However, as more people use mobile devices to access websites, it is difficult to maintain similar responsiveness. Moreover, the current design is very simple and basic, and there is a lack of reactive design options in some aspects. On the contrary, the page builder needs similar settings to maintain responsiveness and performance. But in most cases, responsiveness depends on the size of the page and content. For the purpose of the woocommerce store, we conducted a performance comparison test between Gutenberg and WordPress page builder.
The woocomerce plug-in has been activated, and all sites set the store to the same product. Woocommerce’s requests are similar between the two, but Gutenberg’s page load time is faster than all page builders. This depends on various plug-ins such as multi vendor market display on a single vendor woocommerce site. After analyzing the main findings and observing the above comparison, it can be said that the most important difference between the two tools is the way they look at it
。 Gutenberg introduces himself with blog posts and page content editor, which makes people simply feel a sense of existence. Moreover, even without dictionary knowledge, WordPress users can easily use it. This is beneficial in the long run because most people are looking for user-friendly web building platforms rather than complex platforms. On the other hand, WordPress and page builder are created for users who want to create pages with a larger view and multipurpose. This is designed for users who want to add a wide range of functions and functions on the page in an additional form. Not to mention, a large number of components and blocks provide sufficient design options to improve availability. What should be chosen and why? Now, in the above details about Gutenberg and WordPress page builder, these two tools can be widely used. Therefore, when users use it on the website, they must understand which purposes are better. So let’s take a look at the ideal location for users to choose or use one of these tools. The following conditions are suitable for Tengbao in the male District: The page builder is suitable for the following situations: Male is looking for the prepared basic contents such as tables, buttons, separate blocks, etc. The design, style, down jacket and spacing of the content should be perfectly controlled. Multiple layout columns are still unreliable and need to be improved, so page creation is limited to a single layout column. The page being built needs pre built parts or accessories to expand the added functions. The perfect sorting of male and female content is not a problem. You can use the default sorting option. The basic theme or style of page builder and other page designs must be completely customized or generated. The detail style assignment of male and female content does not pay much attention, but wants to use simple blocks that perform appropriate operations. Male male page making requires flexible and essentially more stable thermal layout. The quick load page is what you are looking for without additional requirements for JavaScript, CSS or fonts. The visually attractive page is what you want, including simple drag and drop functions that can build all types of web pages. According to the comparison of the above table and your work style, you can easily decide which is more suitable for your website. Is the battle still going on or is it over? Well, looking at the current prospects and reconstruction of these charming tools, the debate may last for some time. At present, there may be different opinions as needed, but in fact, there is room for improvement in both tools. Frankly speaking, WordPress page builders such as elementor, divi and Beaver can be said to be friendly and flexible in design in meeting users’ page construction needs. However, this does not mean that Gutenberg has no chance to compete with modern page readers. In fact, Gutenberg will be the automatic choice for all users who want to provide lightweight block editing tools for WordPress content layout. However, it is also true that it does not provide the type control provided by page builders such as elementor. Not to mention the extended additional functions, such as happy addons, essential addons, etc., the element can be used to improve the user’s page creation experience. But if you ask me as you talk about all this, Gutenberg does its job to improve the future by clearly providing several options for daily use.

Author:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *