Code check part 1:“ Early return Using policies to fix design defects

Over there. I thought to myself, \
Go to work.
}The
I hope you will reverse your practice. Please change your mind: \
If this is not true{
Return \/ \/ remedy
}The
Go to work. The highlight point moves to determine whether the function should continue. If not, the function will return in advance where the condition determines that it should stop, stop, and exit. Why is this method better? This method solves the above problems. \
\
Readability directly affects code quality. The more readable, the less time it takes to understand, test, reuse, extend, and maintain. Phased Refactoring: reverse the design and the code above to refactor together. Step 1: the first conditional statement that reverses the first conditional statement is the go \/ no checker. Determines whether to continue running the function. Therefore, you can convert it from the progress inspector to the unable progress inspector and reverse it. Current design communication: \
\/\/Remedies beyond WordPress rest requests.
If (! Definition (\
Return $postsornull
}Please note that this design (1) identifies the \
If (! Is_null ($postsornull)){
Return $postsornull;
}How do I determine that this design is in the \

Author:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *