The question we want to ask recently is: How does the new editing of blocks actually support Gutenberg’s understanding of classic? Gutenberg, as the choice of content editor in WordPress, is getting closer and closer to its official listing. So like all the other new kids in the neighborhood, I had all kinds of reactions to this news. From people who are happy to finally have an official \
The two portfolios of the latter have now made more investments in keeping WordPress unchanged, so their voices are even louder. So I saw a lot of anger in the WordPress community. If you are an active member, you may also see the anger. Maybe you are even afraid to try Gutenberg after seeing the opinions and judgments of a third party. But how does the Gutenberg editor actually compare to the classic? In this comparison, we’ll delve deeper and see how Gutenberg editors endure. From creating content from scratch to interface speed issues. We’ll also look at usability and code quality. The
Our goal is to answer which is the better choice in 2018 \/19. Is there any performance problem with interface performance? Is it significantly slower or faster than the classic editor? These are the two main issues to be discussed in this section of the comparison. Gutenberg’s performance many people were worried about the speed and practical use of Gutenberg’s editor before it was actually launched. Considering that some page builders (unnamed) run very slowly after opening several tabs, even if the new XPS 13 is equipped with 8GB ram, there are far fewer personal laptops equipped with only 4GB ram in the past. This is a big problem. For me personally The
The good news is that the Gutenberg editor can not only add and edit text, but also smooth it like butter, including adding new blocks, images, and galleries, even though it usually opens 40 tabs. One problem I encountered was that moving back and forth between paragraphs might take a little more time to edit the text because the text is divided into paragraph blocks. The only thing that seems to take time is when you change the view from code view to view, and vice versa. Similar experience on old computers that do not consider interface performance issues * * personally, I have not encountered major performance issues on both computers (and I am a fairly fast batter, about 75-80 WPM). Many people regard this as a computer problem. The
The performance of the classic editor and the classic editor have also passed the test with excellent colors. Here, the text does not automatically break the block even if it is not needed. I repeat that the only time it pauses is from the visual view to the code, and vice versa** There are many complaints about Gutenberg’s performance online, but there is little dissatisfaction with the classic editor, and even praise the classic editor plug-ins of new WP users… Conclusion although Gutenberg editor is not significantly worse than the traditional editor, even if there is room for imagination, its performance has not been improved. The
The traditional editor does not actually encounter performance problems, so the traditional editor has advantages because it will automatically shield the dissatisfaction and problems faced by others, resulting in a slightly slower workflow. Of the two availability edits, the first one is \
And Final Cut Pro are outside word press. Conclusion in terms of usability, which editors are at the top is entirely up to the user. If the user is a blogger, the priority is the text editor, and everything else is second, then the traditional editor is still a more intuitive and better choice. If you are a photographer or designer and want to convey a visual story, guthenberg is not as powerful as competitors or WordPress plug-ins, but it will be a more powerful alternative! How does the actual code that compares the completed code side by side with different types of content remain? Will the drag and drop interface damage Gutenberg in any way? This is not an absolute and final answer, not so. If you do a lot of continuous editing, it looks like you’ve added blank lines, but there aren’t many endless containers used by page builders. This is because real drag and drop is not allowed, and style options for other elements are restricted. As a result, you won’t print too many divs or inline CSS resulting in low weight code. We tested various posts, including visual content, and their output was almost identical to that of traditional editors. Simple text post with 2 columns and some pictures -guthenberg androg some headline androg Androg androg androg androg androg androg androg androg androg androg androg androg androg androg november30, 2018 androg androg androg androg androg 0 comments androg androg Male I am literally typing out this as a random example sentence Male Male Male there you go again male Male Why me, I don’t want to lorem Ipsum Dolor sit AMET, consectetur advertising elit Pellentesque efficient Eros justo Male Male Male lorem Ipsum Dolor sit AMET, dissectetur advertising elit Pellentesque efficient Eros Justo, ID Bibendum tortor consecetur vel Proin vitae scelerisque nulla Integer scenerisque Leo a Semper efficiency Nullam premium imperiet turpis, a accumsan erat pharetra et. DUIs faucibus, Massa non mollis ullamcorper, sapien turpis Fringilla MI, et rutrum URNA nisl in nisl Quisque vehicula velit EU vehicula eleifend Donec vel faucibus diam Male Male DUIs venenatis premium nunc EU venenatis Etiam ID Dui feugiat, dictum Magna AC, Fringilla lacus DUIs fermentum ex ut felis interdum consecquat Nulla tincidunt odio vel Magna Congue, vitae faucibus Massa laoreet UT fermentum Quam Nisi, sed accumsan tor faucibus ID. proin Magna EST, ullamcorper tincidunt nisl ID, sollicitudin Fringilla tellus Phasellus et elit ut tortor laoreet cursus Male Male male male male Male male male Male male male male Male male male Male male male male Male male male Male male male male Male male male  
