In the past year, after the release The prospects and how it compete with WordPress’s common traditional page constructors has not ended. After a year and a half, the debate continued. As more and more people upgrade to WordPress 5.0, they have begun to question whether Gutenberg can bring revolutionary changes in the field of page construction. Can it become ideal alternative to traditional drag and drop constructs such as Elements, Divi, and Beaver Builder?
Since its launch in June 2017, Matt Mullenweg introduced Gutenberg as the ultimate and default block editor of WordPress. Since then, for its users, the experience of using its experience has received different reactions, and they have liked and do not like its perfect balance in the world.
At the beginning, Gutenberg encountered many problems, such Wait slowly. But considering the latest version of WordPress 5.4, Gutenberg seems to be a powerful tool with a rapid response block editing mechanism.
But the real question is whether it still has the opportunity to fight the free version of other advanced pages to build device plug -ins, or whether there is any major difference between the two so that they and the two are made by them and the two. Different? Well, such a comparative query is always inevitable.
Therefore, in this article, we try to clarify some basic differences between the constructifier of Gutenberg and WordPress page. Therefore, if you are confused when you understand the applicability between the two, then you can make it The right choice is more suitable for you.
Gutengbao and WordPress page builder: Main differences
Maybe some of your people now use Gutenberg and WordPress pages on your website to build device Real differences. Therefore, you may not know the real purpose of using these magical tools that help to organize your website. Therefore, people in this category will definitely find that the difference below is relatively interesting.
Here, we compared the basic advantages, shortcomings, suggestions, etc. of each tool. So let’s start.
The main products of the constructs of Gutengbao and WordPress pages
Let us analyze the tools according to the following standards, such as [[[[[[[[[ 123]
Blocks and small components
Simple content editing blocks are the main components of Gu Tengbao. This is why most people complain that the characteristics of its blocks and functions lack variants. For the default block of many Gutenberg, it may be enough to constitute their daily content elements, but this may not be enough for more detailed or more detailed designs. But with the latest update, the block has become more flexible now, but it does not cover the shortcomings of its design options.
On the other hand, the WordPress page builder comes with extensive blocks, small components, additional components, etc. This allows users to freely build the page that they need to think closely. It also enables users to use other advanced elements, such as slider, rotation, side by side, tables, and call buttons.
Edit Options When editing the content Back -end -based editor. Although it is trying to enable its front -end editing options, it still cannot provide users with the appearance of the page at the front end.
Although it hides its menu and other settings options from the editor panel of the back end, it gives a fair idea in the front -end view. But this is still not the actual illustration of the webpage or post you are editing. Although you preview it, you can correctly understand the appearance of the page publishing or post -release.
and the WordPress pages of the WordPress page like Elementor have real -time editing functions and dragging page construction functions. This means that you will be able to view all the changes made on the page in real time, as well as the ability of mobile components and other editing functions.
Any adjustment made in front of you will change without leaving the page or save it. This makes editors very easy, because you can correctly correct the location or content to customize.
theme, expansion and expansionCompatibility
When using Gutenberg, you can’t just simply change or adjust the WordPress theme or add extension to enhance its availability. In your entire user experience, it basically keeps unchanged and is idle.
Although the theme style remains unchanged when using Gutenberg, it can add a limited number of CSS and custom CSS to the block. For many users, this sometimes becomes boring because they don’t have much choice to change or play.
But this is not the case when using Page Builder. You can freely use many popular plug -in or extensions on its default theme to improve the performance and availability of page construction.
More importantly, most of them are completely compatible and will not affect their original performance. In addition, you can even make significant changes and updates of the style and settings of its theme. Therefore, if you want to create any custom page layout, its extensive features are very useful for users.
Page format and content design From the date of launch The format option has always been a disadvantage of Gutenberg. It does not allow the custom width of the block, and the percentage of adding column width is possible. In addition, the design options are not so innovative. Stepping from its traditional structure or color to another job that needs quite a lot.
But in terms of content formation and design, WordPress Page Builders is always one step ahead of Gutenberg. The formatting page or the design page is very simple, fast and easy.
The user -friendly interface enables users to adjust any type of page more than before, such as scaling, color, font, custom positioning, element conversion, filling. Although the page you are designing is heavy, it may be a bit lagging.
Response capacity and performance
Today, with the rise of modern technology, most plug -in uses a response design. It tests it on various platforms to ensure its performance benchmark on all platforms. Therefore, in this case, Gu Tengbao is no exception. It has tested its performance and response capabilities on various devices, and has been adjusted on the basis of this.
[12]3]
Because it is a lightweight tool, Gutenberg has not showed any slow or lagging performance so far. But because more and more people use mobile devices to access the website, maintaining similar response ability has become a challenge. Because the current design is very simple and basic, there is a lack of response design options in some parts.
The page builder also needs to make similar arrangements in the settings to maintain its response ability and performance. But in most cases, its response ability depends on the size of its pages and content. The performance comparative comparative comparison between Gutenberg and WordPress Page Builder was performed for the WooCommerce Store. The Woocommerce plug -in has been enabled, and the store has the same product on all sites. Although the two requests on the Woocommerce website are similar, the Gutenberg page loading time is faster than all pages constructors. This is likely to vary from different plug -ins, such as multi -supplier markets on this single supplier Woocommerce website.
The main discovery and observation After analyzing the above comparisons, it is certain that the most important difference between these two tools is how you look at it. Gu Tengbao simply felt its existence by introducing himself to the blog post and page content editor.
Any WordPress user can easily use it, even if they do not use any of its prior knowledge. In the long run, this will be very beneficial, because most people are looking for a simple and user -friendly webpage building platform.
On the other hand, WordPress, the page construct is built to build users with greater vision and multifunctional pages. It is suitable for users who want to add many wide functions and pages in the form of plugins. Not to mention its large number of small components and blocks, they improve its availability and provide sufficient design choices to choose from. So which one should you choose? Why?
From the above details of Gutenberg and WordPress Page Builders, it is clear that these two tools can be used for many good but different purposes. Therefore, for users, when using it on their website, know which one can better help themIt is important to achieve what purpose becomes. Therefore, let’s find out the place that is most suitable for users to choose or use one of them.
If the following conditions are met, the following conditions, Gu Tengbao will be appropriate:
Page builder will be applicable to:
You are looking for a form, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons, buttons Basic content prepared by separate blocks. You need to fully control the design, style, filling, spacing, etc. of the content.
Your page construction is limited to a single layout column, because multiple layouts are still unreliable and need to be improved.
The pages you are constructed need to be built in advance to expand additional functions
The perfect alignment of the content is not a problem. You can use its basic alignment options.
You need to completely customize or create a page design with the default theme or style that is different from the page construct.
You are not very interested in the detailed style of the content, and you want to use simple pieces to complete this work for you.
Your page construction requirement is a flexible but more reliable column layout.
Quick loading the page is what you are looking for, without additional JavaScript, CSS or font requests.
The visually attractive page is what you have, including a simple drag and drop function to build any type of web pages.
According to the comparison of the table above and your working method, you can easily determine which one that is more suitable for you.
The battle continues or ends here?
Well, look at the current prospects and re -establishment of these charming tools, and the debate may only last for a period of time. At present, opinions in this area may vary from person to person, depending on their needs, but from the actual situation, these two tools have room for improvement.
Honestly, it can be said that the WordPress pages such as Elements, Divi, Beaver Builder are more designed with friendship and flexibility in meeting the needs of user page building.
But this does not necessarily mean that Gutengbao does not have the opportunity to compete with modern WordPress pages.In fact, when users want to provide a lightweight block editing tool for their WordPress content layout, Gutenberg has become an automatic choice for all of them.
But it did not provide the control provided by a page construct like Elementor.Not to mention extended plug -in, such as happy plug -ins, basic plug -ins, Elementor allows users to use to enhance the page to build experience.But say so much, if you ask me, then for daily use, Gu Tengbao has only completed your work. Of course, there are several options that can be improved in the future.
But the real question is whether it still has the opportunity to fight the free version of other advanced pages to build device plug -ins, or whether there is any major difference between the two so that they and the two are made by them and the two. Different? Well, such a comparative query is always inevitable. 
Let us analyze the tools according to the following standards, such as [[[[[[[[[ 123] 
But this is not the case when using Page Builder. You can freely use many popular plug -in or extensions on its default theme to improve the performance and availability of page construction. 
